Tito B and the Case of the disappearing WMDs
Good day faithful reader!!!
I am about to take you back a few years, then forward in time, just like Doctor Who, no not the Chinese doctor... the guy with the Tardis and a string of female assistants that he NEVER gets to romp with... Thats why I turned the role down in the first place.. well when I learned it would be Billie Piper as my sidekick I wished to romp no more, but still its the principle that counts... If I am saving the earth every week, I want to have my way with an assistant or three..
that's my terms... take 'em or leave 'em.....
Anyhow back to Tito B. Tito B. is the code name for Tony Blair. I used to work in a call centre in West London, for the Carphone Warehouse, when Tito came to visit(I wonder if all "dignitaries" think the world is clean? I am sure that it was the only time that the call centre was properly cleaned. It doesnt matter if the place is untidy when its just the staff, after all who cares about them??? "sir" Charles Dunstone doesnt...knighted for services to his own pocket and probably loans to the labour party....Maybe....). Anyway, Tito came and went shaking hands with people, apparently he has a POWERFUL grip, gave speech then moved on! The reason I mention this is because I was also working there when they decided to invade Iraq, siting the 45 minute WMD's as the main reason. At the time, although I didnt really see what harm those rockets could do to the UK I did agree that Saddam IS, soon to be was, a bad bad man... Bad meaning Bad, not bad meaning good!
But whether or not they could kill people here is not the point. Did he have the capability to deploy these WMD's in his own region??? Latterly we find out that he really DIDNT have the WMD's, more than that we discovered that our GOVERNMENT knew this(do not blame the security services by the way, its not their fault that they were instructed to come up with the lies that enabled the war... wether or not the should have done it is open to debate) then Tito B LIED to us about the existance of these weapons to justify a war.
That leaves us with a couple of questions... WHY did they want to attack?
Simple answer to that... Beating up on Afghanistan was not enough for the Americans to regain face after 9/11.. their macho self image was disturbed. Add to that the presence of oil in Iraq( I Digress for a moment.... OIL is the SINGLE biggest reason why Iraq has been an issue to western nations for nearly 100 years... go check it out... the Brits kicked out the Ottoman Empire to get at the oil prior to WWI, World War one, and planted the seed of the baath party, Saddams Party!!!! And have been meddling ever since!!!). Last, but by no means least, apparently Saddam had plotted to kill Big Gee Bizzle(George Bush senior), as if a gangsta like Gee Wizzle will let that ride... HELL NO!!!!!!!
Could it be because Iraq under Saddam was defying the U.N. and its resolutions????
Erm, No cos Israel defy UN resolutions at least as frequently as Iraq did, but they are literally allowed to get away with murder time and again! And anyway, the US and the UK, flat ignored what the UN wanted when it clashed with their plans, Hans Blix wanted MORE time to search, the US and UK wanted to invade, so what happened? The Coallition started to interpret what the UN where saying. Hans Blix said we need more time.. the coalition goverments told Blix that what he meant was that we should invade and look for these WMD's at OUR leisure!!! Another little fact is that the Americans were talking about invading Iraq PRIOR to 9/11.... (Now my theory on that is the Americans had some prior knowledge of what was about to happen but let it go as it would give them the excuse they needed to invade Iraq... note how quickly Bush started linking Al-Queda to Iraq, when the truth is that Osama and Saddam were in no way friends... Osama used to criticise Saddam for living in such luxury while he, a pious man it would seem, lived in caves and little huts... plus Saddam tried make fun of Osama being so tall and having a soft voice when they were training at despot school... which happens to be just North of London! )
The other question, is this, did they simply have the desire to remove a bad man from power?????
First thing to say that the United Nations Charter does NOT allow regime change by use of force.... Though if you notice Gee Wizzle is now talking as if that was the plan all along. And I dont seem to recall them forcing other BAD men out of power, Robert Mugabe bein a good example of this.. so that COULDNT be the reason!
Anyway once the decision to go in had been made we have another question........
Could removing saddam really be so bad????
Since Saddam was ousted the level of Violence in Iraq has been unprecedented! 1,500 people are dying each month in Baghdad alone.... 1,500 If the Americans suffered such loses in two months they would cut and run so fast you wouldnt even hear the chinooks taking orf.....
Is this level of violence something the "Allies" could have forseen???
Well I wanna go back a little way in history to a guy I used to work with who was an Iraqi Kurd. He hated Saddam, naturally, but said that you cannot kill him as it would result in civil war, he told me of the make up of the country, the War Lords, the religious divisions... Now he was a regular guy who KNEW that removing Saddam would cause trouble galore... How come Tito B and his half witted boss Gee Wizzle(George Bush Jnr) didnt know this when an everyday dude from London did?
Now Either Tito B and Gee Wizzle are totally incompetent(MMM, Many could believe that!!!) Or they simply did NOT care about the level of violence the Iraqi People would suffer...... I cant say for sure but.... which would suprise you least? I think you should decide for yourself!
Either way, Iraq will be on the agenda for at least another 10 years, Tito B's Legacy(why is this word being used all the time now???) will be the eventual million-plus dead Iraqi people. The escalation of terrorism throughout the world. And yet more people feeling that you simply CANNOT trust the government! Watch for the continued decrease in voter participation...
Saddam Hussein has been tried and sentenced to death(I dont agree with the death penalty by the way, put him in jail and leave him there, state sponsored murder is still murder). But Tony Blair should also be tried(Bush too) for their part in the deception that sent us to war. Their part in turning good young men and women from this country into murderers. I want to say that the soldiers are simply doing their job, its NOT their fault that Blair and Bush and heartless Liars who are happy to send other peoples children off to their deaths or to return brutalised, Blairs boy should have been the first one into Baghdad and should still be there too.. but no WAY would Tito risk his boy, no sir... but YOUR kids?!? thats FINE!!!
The ruling classes still see the working classes as fodder for their use on their path to enrichment....
Anyway.. Peace this is too long... read it in stages!!
I am about to take you back a few years, then forward in time, just like Doctor Who, no not the Chinese doctor... the guy with the Tardis and a string of female assistants that he NEVER gets to romp with... Thats why I turned the role down in the first place.. well when I learned it would be Billie Piper as my sidekick I wished to romp no more, but still its the principle that counts... If I am saving the earth every week, I want to have my way with an assistant or three..
that's my terms... take 'em or leave 'em.....
Anyhow back to Tito B. Tito B. is the code name for Tony Blair. I used to work in a call centre in West London, for the Carphone Warehouse, when Tito came to visit(I wonder if all "dignitaries" think the world is clean? I am sure that it was the only time that the call centre was properly cleaned. It doesnt matter if the place is untidy when its just the staff, after all who cares about them??? "sir" Charles Dunstone doesnt...knighted for services to his own pocket and probably loans to the labour party....Maybe....). Anyway, Tito came and went shaking hands with people, apparently he has a POWERFUL grip, gave speech then moved on! The reason I mention this is because I was also working there when they decided to invade Iraq, siting the 45 minute WMD's as the main reason. At the time, although I didnt really see what harm those rockets could do to the UK I did agree that Saddam IS, soon to be was, a bad bad man... Bad meaning Bad, not bad meaning good!
But whether or not they could kill people here is not the point. Did he have the capability to deploy these WMD's in his own region??? Latterly we find out that he really DIDNT have the WMD's, more than that we discovered that our GOVERNMENT knew this(do not blame the security services by the way, its not their fault that they were instructed to come up with the lies that enabled the war... wether or not the should have done it is open to debate) then Tito B LIED to us about the existance of these weapons to justify a war.
That leaves us with a couple of questions... WHY did they want to attack?
Simple answer to that... Beating up on Afghanistan was not enough for the Americans to regain face after 9/11.. their macho self image was disturbed. Add to that the presence of oil in Iraq( I Digress for a moment.... OIL is the SINGLE biggest reason why Iraq has been an issue to western nations for nearly 100 years... go check it out... the Brits kicked out the Ottoman Empire to get at the oil prior to WWI, World War one, and planted the seed of the baath party, Saddams Party!!!! And have been meddling ever since!!!). Last, but by no means least, apparently Saddam had plotted to kill Big Gee Bizzle(George Bush senior), as if a gangsta like Gee Wizzle will let that ride... HELL NO!!!!!!!
Could it be because Iraq under Saddam was defying the U.N. and its resolutions????
Erm, No cos Israel defy UN resolutions at least as frequently as Iraq did, but they are literally allowed to get away with murder time and again! And anyway, the US and the UK, flat ignored what the UN wanted when it clashed with their plans, Hans Blix wanted MORE time to search, the US and UK wanted to invade, so what happened? The Coallition started to interpret what the UN where saying. Hans Blix said we need more time.. the coalition goverments told Blix that what he meant was that we should invade and look for these WMD's at OUR leisure!!! Another little fact is that the Americans were talking about invading Iraq PRIOR to 9/11.... (Now my theory on that is the Americans had some prior knowledge of what was about to happen but let it go as it would give them the excuse they needed to invade Iraq... note how quickly Bush started linking Al-Queda to Iraq, when the truth is that Osama and Saddam were in no way friends... Osama used to criticise Saddam for living in such luxury while he, a pious man it would seem, lived in caves and little huts... plus Saddam tried make fun of Osama being so tall and having a soft voice when they were training at despot school... which happens to be just North of London! )
The other question, is this, did they simply have the desire to remove a bad man from power?????
First thing to say that the United Nations Charter does NOT allow regime change by use of force.... Though if you notice Gee Wizzle is now talking as if that was the plan all along. And I dont seem to recall them forcing other BAD men out of power, Robert Mugabe bein a good example of this.. so that COULDNT be the reason!
Anyway once the decision to go in had been made we have another question........
Could removing saddam really be so bad????
Since Saddam was ousted the level of Violence in Iraq has been unprecedented! 1,500 people are dying each month in Baghdad alone.... 1,500 If the Americans suffered such loses in two months they would cut and run so fast you wouldnt even hear the chinooks taking orf.....
Is this level of violence something the "Allies" could have forseen???
Well I wanna go back a little way in history to a guy I used to work with who was an Iraqi Kurd. He hated Saddam, naturally, but said that you cannot kill him as it would result in civil war, he told me of the make up of the country, the War Lords, the religious divisions... Now he was a regular guy who KNEW that removing Saddam would cause trouble galore... How come Tito B and his half witted boss Gee Wizzle(George Bush Jnr) didnt know this when an everyday dude from London did?
Now Either Tito B and Gee Wizzle are totally incompetent(MMM, Many could believe that!!!) Or they simply did NOT care about the level of violence the Iraqi People would suffer...... I cant say for sure but.... which would suprise you least? I think you should decide for yourself!
Either way, Iraq will be on the agenda for at least another 10 years, Tito B's Legacy(why is this word being used all the time now???) will be the eventual million-plus dead Iraqi people. The escalation of terrorism throughout the world. And yet more people feeling that you simply CANNOT trust the government! Watch for the continued decrease in voter participation...
Saddam Hussein has been tried and sentenced to death(I dont agree with the death penalty by the way, put him in jail and leave him there, state sponsored murder is still murder). But Tony Blair should also be tried(Bush too) for their part in the deception that sent us to war. Their part in turning good young men and women from this country into murderers. I want to say that the soldiers are simply doing their job, its NOT their fault that Blair and Bush and heartless Liars who are happy to send other peoples children off to their deaths or to return brutalised, Blairs boy should have been the first one into Baghdad and should still be there too.. but no WAY would Tito risk his boy, no sir... but YOUR kids?!? thats FINE!!!
The ruling classes still see the working classes as fodder for their use on their path to enrichment....
Anyway.. Peace this is too long... read it in stages!!
posted by Lilmoonbeam @ 5:16 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home